Should students be required to attend class?
In my opinion students should not be required to attend class.
There are several reasons to support this.
The first major reason for letting the students deside wether to go to university is to develop self-dependent. For example this is crucial as a requirement for your job later.
Another positive aspect for not requireing students to attend university classes is the space gain, because if everbody has to attend, class rooms will always be full.
As the students do not have to attend, it is more easy for them if they are prevented for any reason.
Because you are also more flexible with your dates and it is possible to rewatch the lecture online.
To sum it up, attending university as optional is the best way to have a healthy attendence of the students, with benefits on bide sites.
Sonntag, 29. Mai 2011
TRandom4
If i would be able to change a few things in my hometown i would change some specific aspects.
One major point would be the infrastructure. At the moment you will need over one hour to reach the motorway.
Also you need over 30 Minutes to get 30kmk far. If the infrastructure would be improve, the quality of living would also benefti.
Another important aspects and as a result of a better infrastructure is the improvement and creation of jobs. Because the city is on the countryside, the must be benefits for comapnies to come or stay in the area.
THe last point would be to improve the activities which take place in the city. For example the current activties only support older people whereas younger poeple have a deficit. To improve the situation there should be activites and possibillities which conrectrate especially on younger persons.
As you can see there are a lot of apsects in the town which can be improved for the benefit of the people living there.
One major point would be the infrastructure. At the moment you will need over one hour to reach the motorway.
Also you need over 30 Minutes to get 30kmk far. If the infrastructure would be improve, the quality of living would also benefti.
Another important aspects and as a result of a better infrastructure is the improvement and creation of jobs. Because the city is on the countryside, the must be benefits for comapnies to come or stay in the area.
THe last point would be to improve the activities which take place in the city. For example the current activties only support older people whereas younger poeple have a deficit. To improve the situation there should be activites and possibillities which conrectrate especially on younger persons.
As you can see there are a lot of apsects in the town which can be improved for the benefit of the people living there.
Freitag, 27. Mai 2011
TRandom3
In my Opinion games are as important for adults as they are for children.
There are several reasons to support this.
One major reason for the importance of games is the presence of a lot of games who are played by adults. For example there are a lot of games which are designed especially for adults and have quite a sophisticated gameplay.
Additionally games in a group are mostly very enlightening. For myself evenings playing board games with friend are always humorous because of the conversations during the games.
As a last aspect the importance of games is the ability to socialize with others. This will help you especially on your job. For example the behavior you have towards others during a game, you also will have when your at work with colleagues.
In conclusion playing games not only benefits you while being a child, but also later as an adult. If you have persons around you who find it childish playing boardgames you actually should not care about it and just enjoy playing your games.
There are several reasons to support this.
One major reason for the importance of games is the presence of a lot of games who are played by adults. For example there are a lot of games which are designed especially for adults and have quite a sophisticated gameplay.
Additionally games in a group are mostly very enlightening. For myself evenings playing board games with friend are always humorous because of the conversations during the games.
As a last aspect the importance of games is the ability to socialize with others. This will help you especially on your job. For example the behavior you have towards others during a game, you also will have when your at work with colleagues.
In conclusion playing games not only benefits you while being a child, but also later as an adult. If you have persons around you who find it childish playing boardgames you actually should not care about it and just enjoy playing your games.
Donnerstag, 26. Mai 2011
TRandom2
Teachers should be paid on how much their students learn.
Nowadays teachers in Germany are not paid as well as 20 years ago.
The question is, should teachers be paid on how much their students learn?
In my opinion there are several reasons to support this.
One major aspect is the motivation of the teachers. Because when teacher get only paid for their successful work, they will encourage more. For example in belgium teachers get rated by their students every year.
Another advantage is the improved learning of the students. As teachers are more motivated to teach their students, they will benefit from a better lecture or course. If you compare your different teachers you had in school you will see a connection between how motivated the teacher was and how much you learned form him.
Further this will also help to get rid of the so called black sheeps. Because if a teacher is not motivated enough and it does not concern him, if his students learn enough, he will recieve much less money and as a result he either has to improve or change his job.
In conclusion there are a lot of benefits for paying teacher only for what they teacher their students. Not only it improves the knowledge of the students but also helps to improve the quality of the general education.
Nowadays teachers in Germany are not paid as well as 20 years ago.
The question is, should teachers be paid on how much their students learn?
In my opinion there are several reasons to support this.
One major aspect is the motivation of the teachers. Because when teacher get only paid for their successful work, they will encourage more. For example in belgium teachers get rated by their students every year.
Another advantage is the improved learning of the students. As teachers are more motivated to teach their students, they will benefit from a better lecture or course. If you compare your different teachers you had in school you will see a connection between how motivated the teacher was and how much you learned form him.
Further this will also help to get rid of the so called black sheeps. Because if a teacher is not motivated enough and it does not concern him, if his students learn enough, he will recieve much less money and as a result he either has to improve or change his job.
In conclusion there are a lot of benefits for paying teacher only for what they teacher their students. Not only it improves the knowledge of the students but also helps to improve the quality of the general education.
Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2011
TRandom1
Nowadays people do not work for a longer period of time at one company.
Most people do not even work their for longer than 10 years.
But should companies hire people for their entire lifes?
In my Opinion people should not be hired this long, because there are many reasons against it.
The first reason relates to the social surroundings. If you to get along with your coworkers or bosses for your entire life and the relationship is not as good as it should be you will have a very unpleasing work atmosphere and you will not be motivated for work.
Another reason is the possibility for learning and improving yourself. If you work only at one company, you will not see different subjects and will not have to learn new aspects. This is also important for not doing the same work over and over again.
The last major point is the freedom of choice. Because if you limit a person in their ability to choose something different after a while, you maybe will have a very unsatisfied worker who does not work in favor of you company goal but only for getting the work done.
In conclusion limiting a worker to work at a company for his entire life is not a very practical goal and therefore companies should not enforce people to work on one place.
Most people do not even work their for longer than 10 years.
But should companies hire people for their entire lifes?
In my Opinion people should not be hired this long, because there are many reasons against it.
The first reason relates to the social surroundings. If you to get along with your coworkers or bosses for your entire life and the relationship is not as good as it should be you will have a very unpleasing work atmosphere and you will not be motivated for work.
Another reason is the possibility for learning and improving yourself. If you work only at one company, you will not see different subjects and will not have to learn new aspects. This is also important for not doing the same work over and over again.
The last major point is the freedom of choice. Because if you limit a person in their ability to choose something different after a while, you maybe will have a very unsatisfied worker who does not work in favor of you company goal but only for getting the work done.
In conclusion limiting a worker to work at a company for his entire life is not a very practical goal and therefore companies should not enforce people to work on one place.
Abonnieren
Posts (Atom)